Measure

Keith A. Lewis

January 26, 2025

Abstract
Do not count twice

A finitely additive measure on a set SS is a set function from subsets of SS to real numbers μ ⁣:P(S)R\mu\colon\mathcal{P}(S)\to\boldsymbol{R}, where P(S)={ES}\mathcal{P}(S) = \{E\subseteq S\} is the set of all subsets of SS, that satisfies μ(EF)=μ(E)+μ(F)μ(EF)\mu(E\cup F) = \mu(E) + \mu(F) - \mu(E\cap F) for E,FSE,F\subseteq S and μ()=0\mu(\emptyset) = 0

Measures don’t count things twice and the measure of nothing is zero.

Exercise. Show if ν(EF)=ν(E)+ν(F)ν(EF)\nu(E\cup F) = \nu(E) + \nu(F) - \nu(E\cap F) for E,FSE,F\subseteq S then μ=νν()\mu = \nu - \nu(\emptyset) is measure.
Solution

By μ=νν()\mu = \nu - \nu(\emptyset) we mean μ(E)=ν(E)ν()\mu(E) = \nu(E) - \nu(\emptyset) for any subset ESE\subseteq S. Clearly μ(EF)=μ(E)+μ(F)μ(EF)\mu(E\cup F) = \mu(E) + \mu(F) - \mu(E\cap F) for any E,FSE,F\subseteq S. Since μ()=ν()ν()=0\mu(\emptyset) = \nu(\emptyset) - \nu(\emptyset) = 0, μ\mu is a measure.

Exercise. Show if μ\mu is a measure then μ(EF)=μ(E)+μ(F)\mu(E\cup F) = \mu(E) + \mu(F) for any subsets EE and FF with empty intersection EF=E\cap F = \emptyset.
Solution

Since μ()=0\mu(\emptyset) = 0, μ(EF)=μ(E)+μ(F)μ(EF)=μ(E)+μ(F)μ()=μ(E)+μ(F)\mu(E\cup F) = \mu(E) + \mu(F) - \mu(E\cap F) = \mu(E) + \mu(F) - \mu(\emptyset) = \mu(E) + \mu(F).

Exercise. Show if μ\mu is a set function with μ(EF)=μ(E)+μ(F)\mu(E\cup F) = \mu(E) + \mu(F) for any subsets EE and FF having empty intersection then μ\mu is a measure.
Solution

μ(EF)=μ(EF)+μ(EF)+μ(FE)\mu(E\cup F) = \mu(E\setminus F) + \mu(E\cap F) + \mu(F\setminus E), μ(E)=μ(EF)+μ(EF)\mu(E) = \mu(E\setminus F) + \mu(E\cap F), and μ(F)=μ(FE)+μ(FE)\mu(F) = \mu(F\setminus E) + \mu(F\cap E) so μ(EF)μ(E)μ(F)=μ(EF)\mu(E\cup F) - \mu(E) - \mu(F) = -\mu(E\cap F). Also μ()=μ()=μ()+μ()\mu(\emptyset) = \mu(\emptyset\cup\emptyset) = \mu(\emptyset) + \mu(\emptyset) so μ()=0\mu(\emptyset) = 0.

Exercise. Show if μ\mu is a measure then μ(E)=μ(EF)+μ(EF)\mu(E) = \mu(E\cap F) + \mu(E\cap F') for any subsets EE and FF where F=SF={xSx∉F}F' = S\setminus F = \{x\in S\mid x\not\in F\} is the complement of FF in SS.
Solution

Note (EF)(EF)=E(FF)=ES=E(E\cap F)\cup(E\cap F') = E\cap(F\cup F') = E\cap S = E and (EF)(EF)=E(FF)=E=(E\cap F)\cap(E\cap F') = E\cap(F\cap F') = E\cap\emptyset = \emptyset so μ(EF)+μ(EF)=μ((EF)(EF)=μ(E)\mu(E\cap F) + \mu(E\cap F') = \mu((E\cap F)\cup(E\cap F') = \mu(E).

The space of all (finitely additive) measures on SS is denoted ba(S)ba(S). Note ba(S)ba(S) is a vector space with (aμ)(E)=aμ(E)(a\mu)(E) = a\mu(E) and (μ+ν)(E)=μ(E)+ν(E)(\mu + \nu)(E) = \mu(E) + \nu(E), aRa\in\boldsymbol{R}, ESE\subseteq S. The norm of a measure μba(S)\mu\in ba(S) is μ=sup{Ej}jμ(Ej)\|\mu\| = \sup_{\{E_j\}} \sum_j |\mu(E_j)| where {Ej}\{E_j\} is any finite collection of pairwise disjoint subsets of SS.

Exercise. Show μ=0\|\mu\| = 0 implies μ=0\mu = 0, aμ=aμ\|a\mu\| = |a|\|\mu\|, and μ+νμ+ν\|\mu + \nu\| \le \|\mu\| + \|\nu\|.

Let B(S)B(S) be the vector space of all bounded functions on SS. It has norm f=supxSf(x)\|f\| = \sup_{x\in S}|f(x)|. Vector space norms define a metric d ⁣:B(S)×B(S)Rd\colon B(S)\times B(S)\to\boldsymbol{R} by d(f,g)=fgd(f,g) = \|f - g\|.

Exercise. Show dd is a metric.

Hint: Show d(f,g)=0d(f,g) = 0 implies f=gf = g, d(f,g)=d(g,f)d(f,g) = d(g,f), and d(f,h)d(f,g)+d(g,h)d(f,h) \le d(f,g) + d(g, h) for f,g,hB(Ω)f,g,h\in B(\Omega). Note d(f,f)2d(f,f)d(f,f) \le 2d(f,f) so 0d(f,f)0\le d(f,f) for all ff.

The norm is complete so B(S)B(S) is a Banach space.

Exercise. Show if (fn)(f_n) is Cauchy then there exists fB(Ω)f\in B(\Omega) with limnfnf=0\lim_n \|f_n - f\| = 0.
Solution

Since (fn(x))(f_n(x)) is also Cauchy it has a limit f(x)f(x). Since (fn)(\|f_n\|) is Cauchy it has an upper bound so ff is bounded.

The (vector space) dual of B(S)B(S) is ba(S)ba(S). Given MB(S)M\in B(S)^* define μ(E)=M1E\mu(E) = M1_E and given μba(S)\mu\in ba(S) define M(jaj1Ej)=jajμ(Ej)M(\sum_j a_j 1_{E_j}) = \sum_j a_j\mu(E_j).

Exercise. Show μM\mu\mapsto M is well-defined.
Solution

Every finite sum of the form jaj1Ej\sum_j a_j 1_{E_j} is equal to a function kbk1Fk\sum_k b_k 1_{F_k} where the (Fk)(F_k) are pairwise disjoint. Such functions are uniformly dense in B(S)B(S).

The dual pairing defines the integral Sfdμ=f,μ\int_S f\,d\mu = \langle f,\mu\rangle, fB(Ω)f\in B(\Omega), μba(Ω)\mu\in ba(\Omega). Finitely additive measures make it challenging to prove theorems of the form ‘If limnfn=f\lim_n f_n = f then limnSfndμ=fdμ\lim_n \int_S f_n\,d\mu = \int f\,d\mu.’ However, Fatou’s Lemma does hold for positive finitely additive measures.

The product of a function and a measure is a measure defined by f,gμ=fg,μ\langle f,g\mu\rangle = \langle fg,\mu\rangle. Given measures μ,νba(S)\mu,\nu\in ba(S) we say gg is the Radon-Nikodym derivative of ν\nu with respect to μ\mu if gμ=νg\mu = \nu.